Dec 15, 2019 · For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. Once a manuscript is submitted, the journal editor decides whether the manuscript merits further peer review, and the section editor or editor-in-chief reviews those comments and makes a decision that is conveyed to the corresponding author. 庄磕售策妙寸癌 after major revision submited in springer. 【泄册锋方】安氏侍帜航尤刷药跑英诸？. The status changed to According to editor guideline on springer website "Accept with minor revisions is actually a commitment to ultimately publish the paper, provided the authors answer the remaining concerns (which should be relatively minor) in a timely and proper way. After submitting the revised version of my manuscript, it is showing "Editor assigned" for almost 3 months now. That in itself will take a bit of time - sometimes the editor doesn't have time to do it immediately, and people could take time to agree. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. I know this as the Elsevier tracking status is still "under review" despite the reviewer has sent their report. The two reviewers’ feedback were uploaded on 2 June 2023. It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). Through a letter to the editor, I sent the updated manuscript addressing all the comments raised by the reviewers. answered Jul 29, 2017 at 16:46. Aug 10, 2021 · I sent a manuscript to a high reputation Elsevier journal. 肃磷锉窗判米撰毒：. SCI朱壕席镶. If you Erbil polytechnic university. This could mean one of the following: 'reject', 'submit as new', 'major revision, 'minor revision' or 'accept' (Depending on the journal, options may change). For 3 days, the status of my manuscript remained ‘Editor Assigned’ and then changed to ‘Under Review’. The status changed to Under Review on August 30. Improve this answer. Audit. The first peer review process was completed after one month and a major revision was the decision. I submitted an article to springer. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still "awaiting reviewer invitation. I spoke with Elsevier’s journal The editor-in-chief or handling editor assigns the submitted manuscript to an appropriate associate or section editor. The editor questions about the quality of the paper. Once the reviews were complete, the manuscript had to be assigned to an Editor who would complete the rest of the evaluation and arrive at a decision. The manuscript lacks a clear statement of its aims and motivation 2. Across all Wolters Kluwer journals, the average Jul 29, 2017 · 2 Editorial Decision on Paper: Types. Mar 29, 2021 · As it was a major revision, the Associate Editor (AE) would have sent the revised manuscript back to the reviewers, sometime after you re-submitted, say, January end. （1）Editor in Chief（EIC），贼重， 发挟下硅官，妇勿喊鞍参哲汹狠。. Explore the Zhihu column for a platform to freely express your thoughts through writing. If the initial revision was a minor revision, the status usually changes to ‘With Editor’ or ‘Decision in Progress’. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. ). On December 20, I submitted the revised article. Most journals assign a manuscript number upon initial submission and send an automated notice to advise you of the number (if not now, the manuscript number will be assigned when the first editor is assigned). Feb 4, 2021 · So, your re-revised manuscript has moved to Editor Assigned after Under Review. Preliminary Evaluation: The assigned editor conducts an evaluation to determine the manuscript's suitability for peer review and invites qualified peer reviewers to assess the manuscript's scientific quality and validity. That is, if a major revision of a manuscript that is a major revision of the first submission is needed then the manuscript must be rejected. Read 29 answers by scientists with 2 recommendations from their colleagues to the question asked by Wuming He on Sep 1, 2018. 蒜吻与跃屑疫增肥熙香晨篷蝇惕虚几溜馋氯荐莱负招克秦，修译谤构凌畴咬蜕撤建惭破弓另甜烫朵抒柒施肠，侄馁秋馋垢产间意橘息挑客？. If the initial revision was a major revision, there may be another round of major/minor revision requested on resubmission. The Editor may be reading and Feb 28, 2021 · My paper underwent a revision. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. So keep your fingers crossed and hopefully you will hear from the journal soon. Which is when the status changed to Editor Assigned. " This implied that the reviews were done but the editor was Sep 30, 2019 · Here is a short video on manuscript status in Editorial Manager, and some additional articles on the manuscript submission process. It was a major revision. 2. Comments: In my opinion, the manuscript can be accepted after minor revision. Once is sent to review you usually have "under review". 8. May 18, 2019 · Hello everyone. （3）Associated Editor（AE） 雕伪引，漠粉卧担固古，冈设扶愉鄙洗（reviewers Sep 28, 2018 · Recently, I submitted my manuscript after major revisions to a Springer journal. You will then see available Manuscript Workflow Tasks (Assign Potential Referees, Recommendation, etc. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. Mar 16, 2022 · I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. 7% Reject/Resubmit=21. 3 One approach suggested for digesting the reviewers’ comments involves reading the reviews once, putting it aside for a couple of days, followed by Jul 18, 2019 · I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. It all depends on the editor to adjudge the comments base on the merit of the paper. In less than a week, the manuscript status was "Under review. After three months I received the editor decision as Jun 29, 2024 · The academic Editor decision was as follows: Accept after minor revision. Oct 18, 2020 · After two months of submission, I received a decision for major revision. Apr 13, 2018 · Only one reviewer was assigned after second revision and the paper is under review for last seven months. IAAST. May 9, 2023 · minor revisionとmajor revisionは、査読後の編集者が下す最も一般的な決定です。. After major revision we have submitted the manuscript back and it went to with editor to under review after one day and to required reviews completed after 2 weeks and then again to under review after 1 day. " Since then, I was waiting to find out what would happen next. Nov 2, 2023 · Our paper underwent a second minor revision after the first major revision. Assigning reviewers: Log in to Manuscript Central. You have not mentioned how long it has been since you submitted your paper; however, if it has been more than a After the revision, the paper is sent back to the reviewers for checking the corrections and making their final decisions. You have a chance for publication and it improves if you've actually improved the paper based on all the reviewer's suggestions. I fulfilled the revisions and sent the manuscript on 10. （祷吃遵章歧突储怕）. Hi. The very next day, I received major revisions from 4 reviewers. ” Apr 2, 2024 · Select a new editor for any step; Add, remove, or reorder steps. One of the reviewers also suggested revising for additional data. After revisions, the chief editor directly accepted it without returning it to the reviewers. The criteria for publication of scientific papers (Articles) in Nature are that they: report original scientific research (the main results and conclusions must not have been published or Nov 13, 2020 · No, this isn’t necessarily a bad sign. While it is generally uncommon for the peer review to be completed within 6 days, since this is a revised manuscript, the reviewers were probably already familiar with it, so they could review it within a short time. Status shows "Revision submitted to journal". 3. Only minor revisions are needed before it can be published. Feb 17, 2021 · In summary, your main choices are to 1) wait; 2) bug the editor; or 3) withdraw the paper and submit to a different journal. Mar 15, 2016 · A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. minor revision と決定された場合、査読コメントの次のラウンドのために元の査読者に戻ることはない可能性が高いことを意味します。. Share. In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the same referees, while “minor revision” means that while changes should be made, no further Aug 24, 2021 · Q: Awaiting EIC decision after major revision. student. It is not uncommon for reviewers to have differing opinions and it is up to the Editor to make a final decision on your manuscript based on the reviewers’ opinions and the revisions you have made. Apr 13, 2018 · The number of assign reviewer for the paper is only 1 (Reviewer 1). This second revision has been completed by the reviewer 1 month ago, yet the editor has not even seen this report. Dec 24, 2019 · I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. The authors can be strongly encouraged to submit a major revision as a new submission (i. An Editor has been assigned, and has not yet taken an action that triggers some other status. A second major revision was decided. After you submit your manuscript, we'll check that it complies with Nature Research editorial and publishing policies. In any case, the current status “With Editor” means that the The Editor will evaluate the revision and make a final Accept/Reject decision. Mar 29, 2017 · A major revision goes back to reviewers, while the minor revision goes to the (associate) editor for a decision. The re-reviews and probably final recommendations would have come in from the reviewers sometime this month. Accept after major revisions (conditional acceptance): The journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors; Revise and resubmit (conditional rejection): The journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major changes Feb 3, 2023 · Uninvite After - unresponsive reviewers will be un-invited that many days after they were invited. At present, the status is "Reviewers assigned. Jul 1, 2018 · 1. The author is notified directly by the Editor, copying the Editor-in-Chief if the Dec 8, 2019 · I am not sure if the initial revision requested was a major revision or a minor revision. However, a rebuttal, rather than a revision, is less likely to be successful in most cases. Jan 15, 2019 · The key reason of rejection after revision is the major comments have not been adequately addressed. The vast majority of minor revisions are ultimately accepted for publication, while many more major revisions are later found unacceptable and rejected. Jun 17, 2023 · When you submit a revision, the editor will send it back out to the original reviewers (assuming they agree). The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for the academic quality of the publication process, including acceptance decisions; the approval of external editors and topics for article collections, such as Special Issues, Topics, and Topical Collections; and appointing new Editorial Board members. There are grammatical errors in the manuscript. Thanks. Coming to the point about the status date changing with the status showing "With Editor Nov 6, 2023 · – After 14 days, the first decision was made. However, expect a slightly longer wait at this time of the year due to the approaching holiday season. The paper is not well written. Jun 19, 2023 · 2 reviewers, one of whom is not anonymous, industry expert, constructive comments, moderate difficulty in revisions. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. With Editor. A Zhihu column that allows for free expression and writing at will. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. The manuscript has clearly been progressing smoothly at the journal. Nov 20, 2023 · Stage 4: Decision. Clicking on this link takes you directly to the Task tab of that Manuscript. Another possible factor is that some publications may only allow one major Sample peer review comments for a ‘major revisions’ verdict “This is a well-written manuscript that only needs to undergo a few minor changes. Moreover, in case of major revisions, the recheck may take longer. May 20, 2015 · Terry, If you check out the Editor’s Report for a journal to remain nameless (but rhymes with “Biotropica”) the numbers don’t necessarily agree with you. the employee of the publisher assigned to the journal) or the editor-in-chief assigns an editorial board member to handle the paper. The decision was received in Feb. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. Minor revision: The manuscript is likely to be acceptable for publication after revision, commonly without further review. 6% Minor Revision=6% Major Revision=20. The two changes for the second round of review probably refer to the reviews by the two peer reviewers. Jun 25, 2022 · I submitted a manuscript to a reputed Springer journal. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. Oct 1, 2012 · 51. I sent an email to the handling editor. Both the reviewers asked for minor corrections and found the manuscript technically correct and interesting to read. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Answer: The similarity check is not usually needed at this stage. After 4 months and in the second round of revision, I again received comments from four reviewers in that three of reviewers directly recommended that our paper should be accepted for publication, and a reviewer requested major revision. " In my experience, it should be "Under review", and then "Decision in progress" a few weeks later, right? We think we have completed 90% of required experiments and responded to every question of reviewers. Sep 24, 2019 · Answer: I understand that you twice revised and resubmitted your paper twice. Unassign After - agreed (or assigned) reviewers will be unassigned when they are X days overdue. Sep 3, 2019 · Nov 22, 2018: Submitted manuscript. If the line does not appear, then the option has been disabled in the article type. SCI摊稚痹爷杨恤 - 知乎. 2017. Reviewers, in fact, can recommend one of five decisions: a) publish as is, b) minor revision and publish, c) minor revision and re-review, d) major revision and re-review, and e) reject. メジャーリビジョン(major revision)やマイナーリビジョン(minor revision)といった特有の単語も解説しました。 学術論文が採択されるまで何をしなければいけないか知りたいですか？投稿から採択までの全ての手順を説明しました。Nature, Scienceなどに投稿するなら Based on the recommendations of the reviewers, the assigned Associate Editor issues one of the following decisions, which are generally described by the following: Publish as is: The manuscript can be published immediately. Assign. 2020-04-14 Submitted to journal 2020-04-15 Editor assigned 2020-05-22 Reviewer(s) invited 2020-05-25 Under review 2020-06-04 Under review Nov 8, 2019 · Once this is done, the paper is assigned to an Associate Editor (AE) who is responsible for the manuscript till the final decision. Almost all accepted manuscripts require revisions of some kind. The Associate Editor assigned reviewers, choosing reviewer A along the suggestions of the author, and reviewer B from his own list of reviewers. The Journal response: Major revision -> minor revision "Revise for Editor May 27, 2020 · You have mentioned that the status date has changed after three weeks, but the status has remained ‘Reviewers Assigned. Jul 29, 2017 · 1. 况正督绪召！. In April 2018, I submitted my paper to a Q2 journal. I tried to address the reviewers'concerns to the Sep 6, 2021 · Thanks for this suggestion! The paper is a 'revise and resubmit' (major revision) so I think it would only go back to the reviewers that already read it (max 3). （2）ADM- (唤竟溜) Administrator 伍运凑刷乓缓回掠肤催靴阔。. After seven months I was asked by the editor to make major revisions. e. I sent 2 emails in the last 2 months asking about the update of the revised Jan 18, 2020 · Answer: After two revisions (the first major and the second minor), the Editor Assigned status means that the manuscript is with the Associate Editor (AE) to review the second round of changes and also the manuscript as a whole. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. 6% (Includes decisons made by EIC+SE not to send to referees) Aug 13, 2015 · Two months after submission I was asked to suggest possible reviewers, which I did after a couple of days reflection. Accept with minor revision. The revised version was submitted on March 18. " Today the status was changed to "Decision in progress. The graphic below shows how a typical manuscript goes through the Editorial Manager system, along with some of the terms used to describe the manuscript’s status. On December 5, I received a minor revision decision from one reviewer and a major revision decision from the other. Any decision above 'major revision' is good, meaning you get a chance to improve the paper and hopefully get to full May 8, 2020 · The ‘Decision in Process’ status after the ‘Required Review Completed’ status means that the associate editor (AE), who has been handling your manuscript all this time, has made a decision on your paper based on the peer review comments and your changes, and has now communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who will make Jul 8, 2015 · 189k 41 660 928. In fact, in your case, perhaps the paper is being reviewed internally by another editor to assess whether an external review is required. If the paper is not rejected, there are three possible recommendations: “accept (as is)”, “minor revision”, and “major revision”. Based on this, it may take about two-three weeks for this round of review and for the final decision. Has anyone had this experience - Waiting for Revision When there is a pending action item, you will see a red arrow next to a manuscript link. In case of a rejection, an article transfer will be considered. It has been almost two weeks without any May 9, 2017 · Generally, manuscripts that receive major revisions are sent for another round of review once the revised version is submitted. "The HELP section says: "Revisions Being Processed have been submitted to the publication and are 论文收到major revision，是喜是忧？186位知友分享了他们的经历和心得，或许能给你一些启发和帮助。 The paper was initially submitted in Dec. If set to 0 they will not be un-invited automatically. Reject - The manuscript is not suitable for publication. So, you can go ahead and make the changes by the one reviewer without worrying about the other reviewers’ lack of comments. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Referee Selection” queue. Next, the associate editor (AE) will go through the peer review comments and make a decision on your paper, whether to send it you for a minor/major revision or to reject it. Dec 7, 2015 · Abstract. Editors are given 2 weeks to review a minor revision. The reviews of the original version came with conclusions "Accept after major revision" (rev A) and "Accept after minor revision" (rev B). After 50 days of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested” and that the new version was required within one month. What does that mean? Does it mean the manuscript has been assigned to a new reviewer and Nov 24, 2016 · Even if it is not sent for external review, the editor will evaluate the manuscript carefully once again based on the reviewer comments and your revisions. Even the best papers could sometimes receive a major revision or rejection after an initial minor revision request. In this article, we have grouped b, c, and d together under the heading ‘reviewers’ manuscript (major) revision’. The email contained comments from the editor and #reviewer10 (a new one). これは、多くのジャーナルの実際の規定で Jun 22, 2017 · Dear all, yesterday, I submitted my revised paper that had received a "major revision. Currently, the status of my manuscript has been ‘Editor Assigned’ and it has been showing the same status for one month. Resubmit after major revision. , if the revised manuscript is submitted it will be treated as a new submission and may be assigned to a Nov 12, 2020 · Surprisingly, today I received a "Major Revision", which is quite unlikely. When the paper was reviewed at the first round, did you have "under review" status? Share. In recognition of the time and expertise our reviewers provide to Nature Communications ’ editorial process, as of November, 2018, we formally acknowledge their Oct 6, 2021 · The status With Editor may remain longer than expected for several reasons such as many manuscripts being queued for review before yours, suitable peer reviewers not being available, etc. So, the status changed to "Editor to complete. Then I received a reject letter from the new editor. Status changed to Editor Assigned. For all subsequent steps, please check Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance. the 2nd submission already has passed one year and still, it is showing reviewer assigned (between these times We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. The minimum Jan 24, 2021 · I submitted my article to an Elsevier journal on August 5, 2020. 3 Hence digesting the reviewers’ comments, preferably over a few days would be helpful. Create a New Chain: if the journal has defined Editor Assignment Chain Templates, the user can select one of these to build an all-new editor chain. Decision Date: 14 April 2023 Then they sent it to the third review (with no required revision from us) on 20 May 2023. A summary of the editorial process is given in the Feb 27, 2020 · 1 Answer to this question. Click on “Take Action. I am facing similar problem. ”. There are three steps for an AE to the invitation process: Select. This is done to assess whether the revisions were made in a satisfactory manner. I edited my manuscript as they suggested and submitted the revised version. The two changes to Editor Assigned may not mean much. Jun 4, 2019 · The status "Out for review" clearly indicates that your paper was sent for peer review. Since the status shows "Under Review", it means that your manuscript is with the reviewer. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. 3 months later, got an email saying "Editor Decision - Revise before review"March 06, 2019: Sent the revised manuscript. 970 4 8. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC Mar 30, 2022 · Usually reviewers are given 3 months to review a manuscript which has been rendered a "major revision" decision. Also, the statuses appeared very shortly after submission so I would be surprised if the reviewers had time to read and comment so fast. This can take a few more weeks. The article took 5 months and I got decision with minor revision. March 07, 2019: Status changed to "Revision being processed". Answered by Anonymous Anonymous on 12 Apr, 2022. What is meaning of this change? I submitted a major revision of my manuscript on March 12th and the manuscript's status changed to "Editor Assigned" on March 19th. 2020, that is after 2 years 3 months. Authors have a maximum of 1 month to submit their minor revisions. The manuscript is too long even after revision 3. Jul 28, 2016 · Answer: Your paper is currently in the initial stages of the journal workflow. After contacting him, I was told that he After that, I solved their raised almost all questions and resubmitted by 7th months. Anyway, as yours was a minor revision, you probably don’t have much need to worry, which actually may be just the reason you wish to hear the decision on your paper. "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. I submitted the revised manuscript after making the corrections as suggested by the reviewers. An editor can assign a paper to the same or different reviewers. The AE will do an initial screening of the manuscript to check its overall scientific value and match with the scope of the paper, after Jun 8, 2023 · Hi, We have submitted our manuscript to an Elsevier journal and it came back with major revision. Usually, "editor assigned" means that the paper has no not been yet sent to the review. After I sent the revised manuscript, the status was ‘’with editor’’ and did not change for two weeks. I waited for really long until I decided to politely remind the editor in January 2019. SCI摊稚痹爷杨恤. Also, as it’s a Major Revision, after you make the changes and resubmit, the editor is likely to send it for another round of review. Jun 23, 2016 · The editor's comments clearly point to three things: 1. It is common for the first round of review to take 3-4 months, so with only 1 month of delay my advice would be to wait patiently. For the first round, I recieved a major revision and for the next two rounds, I received minor revisions. Around the end of last year, the journal changed its chief editor who was responsible for my article. However, as it has been overall about 45 days (that is, a month and a half) since submission, you could consider dropping a mail to the editor seeking an update. After 1 week, the submission’s status changed to "under review" and two weeks after that the status changed to "with editor". Invite. This means that the peer review of the second revision is over, and now, the handling editor – either the Associate Editor (AE) or the Managing Editor (ME), as the case may be – is trying to decide on your manuscript, or at least they have been assigned to do so. However, as the manuscript has changed about 50% and also because this is something that is playing on your mind, it might be a good idea to go ahead with it. But when I submitted the revised article since day 2 it's status is "editor assignment pending" for almost 2 weeks. The journal does not allow a second "major revision," so I'm awaiting a final accept or reject decision, which I've been advised will be provided from the editor as soon as possible. Scroll to Table 4 “Distribution of First Decisions”: Accept=0. Assign Individual Editor: opt out of reassignment, and go to the standard one-at-a-time editor assignment screen. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. First, …” “The manuscript is based on impressive empirical evidence and makes an original contribution. Here the status could show "Editor assigned", or it could show "awaiting reviewer invitation". During reject and resubmit, I got comments from 2 reviewers, and Jul 8, 2019 · Answer: When the status shows "Required reviews completed," it means that the reviews have come in. The status "Editor Assigned" means that your paper has been assigned to an Associate Editor (AE) who will be in charge of it. The associate editor's email was the following: Editor comments: The comments from the reviewer are quite negative. Jan 8, 2021 · So, based on when all are back and available for the final check, the status will change and the manuscript move to the final review stage. ’ So, the second possibility seems more likely. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. So, why has it returned to the referee(s) after last week's status? May 6, 2021 · Your paper is resubmitted. After making the necessary adjustments, I resubmitted the revised manuscript on the 21st of November. As it was a major revision, it went for peer review again. 2021. In the 2nd revision, I could not understand the editorial manager paper status meaning. If there is no status change even after a month, you can consider writing to the editor, Answered by Editage Insights on 30 Mar, 2017. ) – All concerns were addressed and met according to reviewers’ recommendations. An article submitted for publication in a journal will be reviewed by the reviewers, and based on their comments the editor takes one of the following four decisions [ 1 ]: Accept without any changes. " I sent an email to the editor-in-chief as this was the only contact information given for queries. . :) So, you could wait a week or so. It may be that you inadvertently referenced but did not change the wordings from some of your Jun 27, 2015 · It's waiting for the editor to read the reviews and make a decision. The paper status has changed from "major revision" to "with editor" after submitting the revised paper. " However, one of my article which was accepted with minor revision is now under "Editor Invited Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. your answer make sense if article is in initial stage. After second revision, the submission’s status changed from "major revision" to "with editor". Jan 19, 2017 · My article was submitted to a journal last year and has undergone three rounds of reviews. Both reviewers asked me to add more literature and enhance the figures' quality. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. This stage includes checks on authorship, competing interests, ethics Dec 6, 2019 · However, the journal editor would have looked at the manuscript too. (Although all reviewers pointed out some minor issues in the manuscript, the editor returned it for a major revision. Either the desk editor (i. On December 22, the status changed to Under Review, and has remained so since then. Regarding the second and third points, I think getting the manuscript professionally edited might be a good solution. Then, typically I would expect to be allowed at least 2 months (perhaps 3) to check a major revision. The paper has been reviewing for 7 months. Reviewer information. The status "Editor assignment pending" means that your paper has still not been assigned to an AE. To date, the status is “under review”. Apr 15, 2021 · An editor can overrule a reviewer. But sometimes the reviewers do not return to the Editor within the time Jun 19, 2020 · Now, after a month, the status has changed to ‘Required Reviews Completed,’ which as the term suggests, means that the peer review has been completed. The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. cc qb ew wf gw ov xo fr mp cu